I love drawing on whiteboards, but sometimes that medium is too modern. Sometimes the feel of graphite or charcoal reminds me that what I do requires a lot of my art school basics.
With the invention of tools such as Photoshop and Illustrator I was very threatened as an art school student, I felt as though these tools would pervert "art".
I think I was right. They disconnect me from my instincts and the only way I can instinctually design what really is in my head is through drawing and sketching as free form as possible-hence newsprint and charcoal.
I love planning, testing and being educated about a concept before I start executing on it.
I also try very hard to be original and not follow the pack when it comes to typography and color.I've been working on a concept that I haven't seen in many websites..it's a bit of a mini experience.
What if God was an astronaught/scientist who piloted a space craft into a void billions of years ago? What if he/she tried to use a device to create himself/herself a new planet/area/ecosystem to survive on? What if the experiment/plan went wrong and he/she caused an impossibly large and powerful explosion, and became apart of the fring of the Big Bang itself?
Maybe this being is forever riding an explosive wave of cosmic consciousness, creative energy and pain, forever aware of us, of all life, trapped in/apart of an experiment gone "wrong".
I don't always like to listen, I like to be listened to and I like to be right.
This is a problem for any chance at real personal or professional growth, not to mention team collaboration in either realm. To act against this shortcoming, I organize dinners where "creatives" get together and talk over what we struggle with.
The dinner forces me to listen and reminds me to stay open. It also puts my somewhat chaotic gregariousness to good use. In attendance were Anne Kadet and Tarah Feinberg.
I kicked off the discussion by frankly admitting that I have trouble asking questions, particularly the "right" questions. I work for a startup and I'm very sensitive to completing tasks quickly but also sensitive to giving myself enough information to not only finish tasks, quickly but finish the right tasks. So pausing the production cycle is something I try to do cautiously, sometimes too cautiously.
As usual, this admission led to the conversation blossoming.
We discussed the need for open learning and improvement. Mostly how learning about a thing to change was the first step in the path to actually changing it.
Anne had kicked that topic off: "The more I educate myself about something I'd rather not do, or that I've been procrastinating doing, the easier it is for me to actually do it."
Tarah and I both related to this.
For me, when beginning a regular Yoga routine some years ago, I promised myself that everyday I'd at least study a new move in the stick figure diagram and then get on the mat. If I didn't feel like doing the new move, I could stop — maybe try it tomorrow. I only stopped about 10 times in the last 5 years of practice, mostly due to illness.
This shifted the example bit to willingness and focusing.
Tarah continued:
"I think of focusing attention a lot like I would literally focus a camera. ..moving the lens past the point of focus and then slowly coming back into focus. Sometimes it takes a few times going back and forth, missing that perfect focus, but you get closer and closer until your image is crystal clear. Likewise, when you want to focus your attention on an idea or a task, sometimes you need to dance around it a bit before you can really immerse yourself in that one thing."
We all enjoyed this metaphor and grunted approval as we began to eat.
Over our meals we talked about life, success in love, money and career and how they all balance each of us out-or in some cases don't.
Our talk about relationships transitioned into being understood…especially at a corporate professional level.
The familiar "My company doesn't understand what I do completely." was heard. "Market your process." was the all too familiar (yet sometimes hard to carry out) solution. The idea of self branding was then focused on.
"To market yourself, don't you also have to know who you are?"
Who are we? Many of us don't know, I know I sometimes don't. Many people can't summarize themselves in 140 characters. Many people don't like being packaged.
But that seems the point of modern social/open communication. To summarize ourselves and our ideas and opinions; to make ourselves digestible by multiple content aggregation channels, feeds and posts. To be searchable, spam-able, tweet-able, likable, stumbled over and recommended.
But is that what's best for us?
For me it gives me the opportunity to express on a daily, sometimes hourly basis, that I'm a constant work in progress. So expressing it openly on profiles, tweets, and posts reminds me to keep progressing, to not rest on laurels —and frankly I need this kick in the ass.
/
Van
Art and design and drawing are all the same thing to me: Playtime
So @stop ( Doug Bowman, Creative Director at Twitter ) one those designers and creative leaders I really look up to tweeted this out the other day.
"A deadline should not limit expectations of excellence. Rather, it defines the length of time you have to achieve excellence."And I (a little harshly I admit) tweeted back: "@stop Sorry, but that sounds like unrealistic management BS." His response: "@vanshea Initially, I thought of them working against each other. But ultimately, excellence can't be compromised." And my response: "@stop Excellence ultimately defined by quality of deliverable, quality is subjective-this issue is a moving target w mgmt moving the target." I believe creative leaders should define "excellence", not just demand good work, great work-the BEST work!! But to literally define what tangible execution accomplishes their idea of excellence.
As an example: While once reviewing an accomplished designer's work, I gave this feedback:
".. I love the main call to action button, but I'm not sure if our demographic will read it as a button quickly enough. My assumption is that they probably need a little bit of glossiness on a button for a quicker read. I know WE don't like that treatment, but sadly we aren't the primary audience."
Eventually in this example, a more "buttony" button was made and it made sense to us. If creative leaders, me included, are trying to focus a team on producing "excellence", it is up to us to clearly define our idea of excellence. Most importantly it is up to us to allow that idea also to be challenged. Creatives thrive on questioning authority and challenging The Rules. If there are tangible guidelines to work from, a structure is available to create against and/or rebel against or in the best case.. completely redefine!
In a recent visual design project I laid out some detailed ground rules for myself:
Drop shadows only on photos of people, none around other content boxes
Content boxes would stand out because of border color against background texture
Most buttons would receed by adding same texture as the background then highlight by losing texture on mouse hover
Uppercase titles would be used in substitution for a heading bar to ground the page